正在載入頁面
觀點

三個監管機構,誰先看見代幣化黃金?

梁衞晉探討實物黃金、投資架構與潛在結算用途如何交匯,並提出問題:哪個機構能看見全貌?

梁衞晉 / LinkedIn

內容摘要

梁衞晉探討實物黃金、投資架構與潛在結算用途如何交匯,並提出問題:哪個機構能看見全貌?

以下轉載 Ronald Leung 於原刊日期發表的評論。觀點、邀請及產品資料反映發表當時的情況,並不構成投資建議、要約、回報保證,亦不代表產品目前可供使用。

Ronald 的分享

Hong Kong already regulates gold in three places. The question we are about to ask does not live in any of them.

Customs handles gold moving in and out. The SFC takes gold once it is packaged into an investment product. The HKMA looks at fiat, and at anything that moves monetary policy.

That map used to work. It was drawn when a bar of gold only did one job at a time.

Now consider the proposition of tokenised gold. It is backed by physical gold. And it has potential to become a settlement unit. All the while gold itself could be an investment target.

The quick answer is to call it a virtual asset and move on.

But gold is unlike Bitcoin. It was not invented.

So the harder question is not which of the three regulators it belongs to. It belongs to all three at once.

The question is who sees it first.

Disclosure: Esperanza operates a tokenised gold business. — Let's open the statute. A new breakdown every week.

三個監管機構,誰先看見代幣化黃金? | Esperanza Perspectives