正在载入页面
观点

创造者还是跟随者:香港的黄金定价之问

创办人就香港在黄金定价的角色提出问题。

梁卫晋 / LinkedIn
AI 生成的编辑插图:暮光中的金融区建筑

以下转载 Ronald Leung 于原刊日期发表的评论。观点、邀请及产品资料反映发表当时的情况,并不构成投资建议、要约、回报保证,亦不代表产品目前可供使用。

Ronald 的分享

The FCA is preparing a framework for tokenised gold. The reason it gave is worth reading twice: to protect the dominance of London.

Hong Kong does not need to catch up on this one. Cap 615 s.53ZTZ already defines a precious-asset-backed instrument. It then lists, one by one, six things such an instrument does not include:

-> a security under Cap 571  -> a futures contract -> an interest in a collective investment scheme  -> a structured product  -> an OTC derivative product  -> a virtual asset

Those six are the line between Hong Kong Customs and the SFC, and they were drawn into the ordinance years ago.

So the open question is not whether Hong Kong can regulate tokenised gold.

In a recent interview with the South China Morning Post SCMP ,I asked: "Does it (Hong Kong) want to be a creator, or a follower?"

It is whether Hong Kong stays a warehouse for the metal, or builds at the instrument and settlement layers, which is a strong lever to power the economy of Asia.

And we're already few steps ahead.