正在载入页面
观点

三个监管机构,谁先看见代币化黄金?

梁卫晋探讨实物黄金、投资架构与潜在结算用途如何交汇,并提出问题:哪个机构能看见全貌?

梁卫晋 / LinkedIn

内容摘要

梁卫晋探讨实物黄金、投资架构与潜在结算用途如何交汇,并提出问题:哪个机构能看见全貌?

以下转载 Ronald Leung 于原刊日期发表的评论。观点、邀请及产品资料反映发表当时的情况,并不构成投资建议、要约、回报保证,亦不代表产品目前可供使用。

Ronald 的分享

Hong Kong already regulates gold in three places. The question we are about to ask does not live in any of them.

Customs handles gold moving in and out. The SFC takes gold once it is packaged into an investment product. The HKMA looks at fiat, and at anything that moves monetary policy.

That map used to work. It was drawn when a bar of gold only did one job at a time.

Now consider the proposition of tokenised gold. It is backed by physical gold. And it has potential to become a settlement unit. All the while gold itself could be an investment target.

The quick answer is to call it a virtual asset and move on.

But gold is unlike Bitcoin. It was not invented.

So the harder question is not which of the three regulators it belongs to. It belongs to all three at once.

The question is who sees it first.

Disclosure: Esperanza operates a tokenised gold business. — Let's open the statute. A new breakdown every week.

三个监管机构,谁先看见代币化黄金? | Esperanza Perspectives